![]() The lack of awareness about the relation of modern criticism to Hegelian philosophy in general and to the dialectic in particular has been so pronounced that critics like Strauss and Bruno Bauer are still, at least implicitly, imprisoned within Hegelian logic, the first completely so and the second in his Synoptiker (where, in opposition to Strauss, he substitutes the “self-consciousness” of abstract man for the substance of abstract nature) and even in his Das entdeckte Christentum.įor example, in Das entdeckte Christentum we find the following passage:Īs if self-consciousness, in positing the world, that which is different, and in producing itself in that which it produces, since it then does away with the difference between what it has produced and itself and since it is only in the producing and in the movement that it is itself - as if it did not have its purpose in this movement… Modern German criticism was so pre-occupied with the old world, and so entangled during the course of its development with its subject-matter, that it had a completely uncritical attitude to the method of criticism, and was completely unaware of the seemingly formal but in fact essential question of how we now stand in relation to the Hegelian dialectic. This is, perhaps, the place to make a few remarks, by way of explanation and justification, about the Hegelian dialectic - both in general and in particular, as expounded in the Phenomenology and Logic, as well as about its relation to the modern critical movement. ![]() The remaining part of the Third Manuscript. - R. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |